UBRISA

View Item 
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Medicine
  • Family Medicine & Public Health
  • Research articles (Dept of Family Medicine & Public Health)
  • View Item
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Medicine
  • Family Medicine & Public Health
  • Research articles (Dept of Family Medicine & Public Health)
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Impact of China’s lockdown policy on the incidence of COVID-19: an interrupted time series analysis

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Molefi_BMRI_2021.pdf (455.6Kb)
    Date
    2021-10-28
    Author
    Molefi, Mooketsi
    Tlhakanelo, John T.
    Phologolo, Thabo
    Hamda, Shimeles G.
    Masupe, Tiny
    Tsima, Billy
    Setlhare, Vincent
    Mashalla, Yohana
    Wiebe, Douglas J.
    Publisher
    Hindawi, https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/
    Link
    https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2021/9498029/#copyright
    Type
    Published Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Background. Policy changes are often necessary to contain the detrimental impact of epidemics such as those brought about by coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In the earlier phases of the emergence of COVID-19, China was the first to impose strict restrictions on movement (lockdown) on January 23rd, 2020. A strategy whose effectiveness in curtailing COVID-19 was yet to be determined. We, therefore, sought to study the impact of the lockdown in reducing the incidence of COVID-19. Methods. Daily cases of COVID-19 that occurred in China which were registered between January 12th and March 30th, 2020, were extracted from the Johns Hopkins CSSE team COVID-19 ArcGIS® dashboards. Daily cases reported were used as data points in the series. Two interrupted series models were run: one with an interruption point of 23 January 2020 (model 1) and the other with a 14-day deferred interruption point of 6th February (model 2). For both models, the magnitude of change (before and after) and linear trend analyses were measured, and β-coefficients reported with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the precision. Results. Seventy-eight data points were used in the analysis. There was an 11% versus a 163% increase in daily cases in models 1 and 2, respectively, in the preintervention periods (). Comparing the period immediately following the intervention points to the counterfactual, there was a daily increase of 2,746% () versus a decline of 207% () in model 2. However, in both scenarios, there was a statistically significant drop in the daily cases predicted for this data and beyond when comparing the preintervention periods and postintervention periods (). Conclusion. There was a significant decrease the COVID-19 daily cases reported in China following the institution of a lockdown, and therefore, lockdown may be used to curtail the burden of COVID-19.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10311/2478
    Collections
    • Research articles (Dept of Family Medicine & Public Health) [13]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBRISA > Communities & Collections > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > SubjectsThis Collection > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > Subjects

    My Account

    > Login > Register

    Statistics

    > Most Popular Items > Statistics by Country > Most Popular Authors