UBRISA

View Item 
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Political and Administrative Studies (PAS)
  • Research articles (Dept of PAS)
  • View Item
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Social Sciences
  • Political and Administrative Studies (PAS)
  • Research articles (Dept of PAS)
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Capacity building in a hostile environment: the case of Zimbabwe’s Rural District Councils

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Mandiyanike_CJLG_2013 1.pdf (485.9Kb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Mandiyanike, David
    Publisher
    Uts ePress, https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/
    Link
    https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/cjlg/issue/view/297
    Type
    Published Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The paper examines capacity building in Zimbabwe’s Rural District Councils (RDCs) from 1994 to 2001 and the resultant erosion of capacity during Zimbabwe’s protracted political and economic crisis that followed. It is prudent to ask whether there was ‘capacity building’ or ‘capacity erosion’. The paper establishes that the capacity building was piecemeal and that there was no genuine desire to build capacity, but that Councils embarked on these programmes to access the funding that came with the programmes. In some cases, the design of the Rural District Councils’ Capacity Building Programme (RDCCBP) was too rigid, derailed by the central government’s half-hearted attempts towards decentralisation, and failed to allow RDCs to learn-by-doing. Because of Zimbabwe’s politico-economic crisis, national level politicians were peremptory in their demands for better RDC results and an opportunity to learn was lost. The plethora of other rural development projects coupled with the project-based approach of the RDCCBP condemned capacity building efforts to the rigidities of projects and programmes, yet capacity building is better perceived as a continuous process with experiential learning. The paper concludes by arguing that capacity building efforts in RDCs were largely unsuccessful, and were derailed by the ‘Zimbabwe crisis’; the result can only be described as ‘capacity building that never was’. Internal efforts by RDCs to build their own capacity are more sustainable than efforts prompted by the ‘carrot and stick’ approach of external actors, such ascentral government (in a bid to ‘hive off’ responsibilities) and funding agencies.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10311/1920
    Collections
    • Research articles (Dept of PAS) [28]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBRISA > Communities & Collections > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > SubjectsThis Collection > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > Subjects

    My Account

    > Login > Register

    Statistics

    > Most Popular Items > Statistics by Country > Most Popular Authors