UBRISA

View Item 
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Humanities
  • Theology and Religious Studies
  • Research articles (Dept of Theology and Religious Studies)
  • View Item
  •   Ubrisa Home
  • Faculty of Humanities
  • Theology and Religious Studies
  • Research articles (Dept of Theology and Religious Studies)
  • View Item
    • Login
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Reasoning and the military decision making process

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    jcnv2i1_Ikpe.pdf (79.34Kb)
    Date
    2014
    Author
    Ikpe, Ibanga B.
    Publisher
    Center for Cognition and Neuroethics, http://cognethic.org/
    Link
    http://jcn.cognethic.org/jcnv2i1_Ikpe.pdf
    Type
    Published Article
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The archetypal view of the military is that of a hierarchical organization whose members are conditioned to respond to command without question. Its election of obedience as “the supreme military virtue” portrays it as subscribing to the highest degree of group conformity possible within any human organization. This view is not helped by the fact that the military adopts a decision making calculus referred to as the Military Decision Making Process (also referred to as The Estimate Process in some military organizations). This seems to suggest that either the soldiers are not expected to think or that whatever thinking it does passes through a decision-making prism which is devoid of the personal inputs of individual soldiers. The irony of the situation is that a course in critical thinking is a required component of staff school training, which is usually a first step towards command and staff appointments in the military. This paper is an attempt to understand reasoning in the military. Using relevant examples, it examines popular clichés about reasoning and the military and the extent to which they are justified by the structure and function of the military. It also looks at the Military Decision Making Process (MDMP) and the extent to which it supports or inhibits autonomous reasoning by individual soldiers, and compares it with other analytical decision making tools. Drawing examples from specific command and staff decisions it concludes that while regimentation may be appropriate for the rank and file, the capacity for reason is an important asset in the military especially as warfare continues to evolve from the conventional to new and bizarre mutants of war.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10311/1799
    Collections
    • Research articles (Dept of Theology and Religious Studies) [25]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of UBRISA > Communities & Collections > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > SubjectsThis Collection > By Issue Date > Authors > Titles > Subjects

    My Account

    > Login > Register

    Statistics

    > Most Popular Items > Statistics by Country > Most Popular Authors